Re: imap.preformattedHTML and imap.sslverify

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy White <jwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I did confirm that your patch does work.
>
> However, I assumed that my original patch was rejected.  
> I never realized that it had been applied.
>
> That clearly means that no one has ever used this option.

Thanks.  I didn't mean to witch-hunt (did I ever say "the originally
submitted patches were untested"?), and I apologise if you took it that
way.  You were Cc'ed because as the origin of the patch you were likely
to be using that feature.

I just wanted to make sure that the problem I thought I saw was real, and
wanted to make sure that I was not overlooking subtleties in the current
code people who are using the feature are relying upon.

Will apply to maint and merge upwards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]