Hi,
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I could not find any reference.
I have been using CVS as a version control system for unix
configuration files for a long time. I know it has some limitations,
and I know git also has its. But I expect to work around all of them
using etckeeper.
The problem is that etckeeper was created with /etc only in mind,
and I want to keep track of important files everywhere, not only below
/etc (think /opt, /usr/local). The obvious solution appear to create
the repository at the system root, and not at /etc, but it did not
work. I think, because of a bug.
Now, I have a patch that appears to work, but since I am a beginner
to git, I don't know if this is the best way to implement it, if it has
any side effects, or even if it works for other operating systems
(probably they don't even have the bug). Would any git wizard care to
look at it, check if it is ok, and maybe commit in HEAD or give me any
advice against my patch?
Please, don't give me any answers like "don't use your root as a
repo". I am a system admin for a long time, and I know what I want and
what are the risks and benefits involved.
Thanks in advance,
Jonny
--- a/setup.c 2010-02-07 22:50:40.000000000 -0200
+++ b/setup.c 2010-02-07 22:51:56.000000000 -0200
@@ -413,7 +413,12 @@
inside_git_dir = 0;
if (!work_tree_env)
inside_work_tree = 1;
- git_work_tree_cfg = xstrndup(cwd, offset);
+ if ( cwd[0] == '/' && offset == 0 ) {
+ git_work_tree_cfg = xstrndup(cwd, 1);
+ }
+ else {
+ git_work_tree_cfg = xstrndup(cwd, offset);
+ }
if (check_repository_format_gently(nongit_ok))
return NULL;
if (offset == len)