On Samstag, 6. Februar 2010, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > However, I have tracked down a bit of what goes on in the client. > There's a call to read_in_full, called from pack-write.c, line 246 > that fails in the failure-case, but not in the success-case. This is > where the client expects "pack\tSHA-1" or "keep\tSHA-1". There "fatal: > early EOF"-messages seems to originate from index-pack.c, line 197. > This is the first line of code in parse_pack_header(), it's also > AFAICT the first call-site for any read(0, <...>) (though fill()). This looks like upload-pack died without sending enough to fill a pack header. Try merging this branch: git://repo.or.cz/git/mingw/j6t.git async-in-thread It contains your changes to start_async plus a refinement of die() when it is called from the async procedure (it passes t5530, for example). It is also converted to pthreads, and therefore also works on Unix. The new implementation of start_async is more careful about the file handles, though not so much on Windows. If there's no change for you, then you could look into implementing fcntl(F_GETFD/SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC), which are currently ignored, on top of this branch, using Get/SetHandleInformation(). Background: On Unix, we need FD_CLOEXEC so that the fds that are meant for the async thread do not remain open in an unrelated child process; on Windows, we are just lucky and can get away without FD_CLOEXEC because our pipe()s are non-inheritable and async only work with pipes. But once we pass other fds to the async procedure, we need a working FD_CLOEXEC. Perhaps something in this direction is related to your problem. You could push out your current state of the git-daemon and a recipe to reproduce the problem. Perhaps I find some time to look into it. -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html