demerphq <demerphq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 3 February 2010 20:26, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Right. The only solution i can see would have had to have been > implemented already. And that would involved some headers being marked > "pass through", some "marked throw away on cherry-pick" and some > "choke horribly if you find this and dont know what it is". > > And even with somethng like that one wonders if notes arent really a > better alternative to user defined headers anyway? Yes, exactly. I think notes turn out to be a much better way to store this extra data, provided you are OK with them being disconnected during an amend, cherry-pick, filter-branch, or rebase... :-) And unlike additional headers, git implementations will likely support notes, because they are a good way to attach additional user data onto commits. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html