<opublikowany i wysłany>
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>> > There is a subtle problem here. Up until now, "remote" meant a short cut.
>> > You either had a file with that name in .git/remotes/ or .git/branches, or
>> > an entry in the config (remote.<name>.url).
>>
>> Not exactly. "git-pull . <branch>" and "git-peek-remote ." meant use
>> _current_ repository. "." as remote name means "current", i.e. local
>> repository.
>
> From Documentation/git-pull.txt:
>
> SYNOPSIS
> --------
> 'git-pull' <options> <repository> <refspec>...
>
> It says "repository", not "remote". As for the name "git-peek-remote":
> yes, it is a short cut for "remote repository".
>
> The thing is, if you say you pull "from a remote", then it is not
> sufficient to specify just a URL of a repository. You also have to specify
> a branch.
O.K. "remote" = "repository + set of branches". But we can say that "."
is a default remote, which points to local repository (".") and has
no branches information.
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html