Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> I was intentionally slating this for maint, to fix a bug a user > >> reported when handling large streams. > > > > I personally see that as adding a new feature (especially with new option > > and config). > > Sorry, but I take it back. The new codepath triggers even without any > explicit request and _fixes_ the situation where old code simply failed, > so it is worth queuing for the maintenance track. Thanks. > Do you want to do the deflatebound thing, or are we Ok without? No, I think we're OK without it. The pack size limit stuff is only a rough guess anyway. I never meant for us to be sticking to it to within a byte. It was only meant to keep us from shoving a 100 MiB blob onto the end of a pack once we got close to the size requested by the user. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html