Dear diary, on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:55:49PM CEST, I got a letter where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> said that... > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Currently it does what git-blame does, but only faster. > > > > More importantly, its internal structure is designed to support > > content movement (aka cut-and-paste) more easily by allowing > > more than one paths to be taken from the same commit. > > > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > I really hate to do this immediately after writing obituary for > > annotate, but I had a solid 24-hour to work on git, which is a > > rare opportunity for me these days, so here it is. > > Why not reuse git-annotate name? git-pickaxe doesn't do pickaxe... I agree that git-pickaxe is wrong, and luckily Junio does too, apparently. But please, let's not go right back to the git-annotate / git-blame situation. It's just confusing to have two tools that do the same thing, perhaps subtly differently. If it's gonna replace git-blame, it should either do that right away or live as git-blame2 for some time, but not play any confusing games with the names. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html