In article <7vtyu3o1hq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ron Garret <ron1@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > You are absolutely right. That is another reason why having the > > individual files tracked separately from the main project would be a > > good thing if I can get it to work. (It would be kind of like having a > > git-stash on a per-file basis.) > > When you have more than one functions defined in a file, and the > interactive Lisp development cycle works primarily on s-exp basis, not > necessarily constrained by file boundaries, don't you want even finer > grained control than "stash per-file"? > > I don't think of a good solution myself, but I find your "finer than whole > tree" an interesting topic. You're reading my mind. My long-term vision for this thing is indeed a revision control system based on S-expressions, not files. (I personally think the whole concept of files is fundamentally broken, but that's a whole 'nuther kettle of lobster.) Unfortunately, that opens up a Pandora's box of ancillary issues, which would be seriously off-topic here. If you're interested we can talk about it off-line (or we can do it here if you think it's not too much of a tangent). rg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html