Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #05; Sat, 16)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> [Stalled]
>>
>> * ap/merge-backend-opts (2008-07-18) 6 commits
>>  - Document that merge strategies can now take their own options
>>  - Extend merge-subtree tests to test -Xsubtree=dir.
>>  - Make "subtree" part more orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive.
>>  - Teach git-pull to pass -X<option> to git-merge
>>  - git merge -X<option>
>>  - git-merge-file --ours, --theirs
>>
>> "git pull" patch needs sq-then-eval fix to protect it from $IFS
>> but otherwise seemed good.
>
> Generally I hate to step in to fix up other's series, especially when I
> know that the party responsible for issues is capable enough.  As the
> pre-release feature freeze gets closer, however, I sometimes find myself
> doing so, and (I repeat) I hate it.

Sorry about that.  I asked at the time whether you thought I should
submit a patch or whether you were planning to do it, and didn't get
an answer.  And then when you wrote the above, I was away on vacation.
 I see it's now been merged into master, but in case you care... it
looks ok to me :)

Have fun,

Avery
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]