Re: shared permissions on COMMIT_EDITMSG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/1/28 William Pursell <bill.pursell@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Ilari Liusvaara wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:19:22PM -1000, William Pursell wrote:
>>> With git-init --shared=0660 and a umask of 022,
>>> the first commit to the repository creates
>>> the file COMMIT_EDITMSG with mode 0644
>>> instead of 0660.  I believe this is incorrect
>>> behavior.  Simple fix:
>>
>> COMMIT_EDITMSG is related to committing, committing needs
>> working copy, and shared working copies don't work all too
>> well (and Git can't do anything about that because all kinds
>> of stuff edits the files there, not just Git).
>>
>> Shared repository settings are meant to override umasks
>> for files in actual repository itself.
>
> For simple work flows (eg recording linear history
> of config files), sharing a working directory
> works okay except for COMMIT_EDITMSG.  Since
> COMMIT_EDITMSG is in the git repository and only
> written by git, it makes sense for core.sharedrepository
> to be honored.

I agree.  And personally ive used shared working directories quite a
bit without issue. Thanks be to git --interactive.

cheers,
Yves

-- 
perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]