Re: [PATCH] Fix remote.<remote>.vcs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:22:07PM +0100, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> Heya,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 17:16, Ilari Liusvaara
> <ilari.liusvaara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > it isn't likely anyone is using VCS setting and multiple
> > push URLs, as VCS setting is meant for non-URL-based helpers
> 
> I don't like that assumption, I've used the vcs setting with regular
> urls myself, is there a different way to solve this without
> introducing that assumption? Also, what happens if one _does_ do that,
> do we crash? abort?

If you have url-based remote helper, then use the <helper>::<URL> syntax.

As for what would happen: If you don't override with URL, the first
URL would use remote helper specified by vcs setting.

Maybe it would be better idea to have vcs setting set the default
helper (that gets used unless you override?)

-Ilari
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]