Hi, IMHO, a really important question is: why do we have so many started-not-terminated GUIs? My point of view: - a "good" GUI is a GUI that integrates well with a desktop - a "good" GUI is a GUI that reuse an already existing/known metaphor The most difficult is that raw Git is "stupid content tracker". So, a complete GUI will expose too many features to end-user: - which workflow: pull, push, email, ssh, ... - topic branches: rebasing or merging - and what about higher level feature: stash, stg, top git... So, reading this, possible good GUIs are plugins for IDE with smallest Git support. 2010/1/23 André Harms <andre.harms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Is there anybody who agrees or disagrees? I really would appreciate > some feedback about that idea. -- Guilhem BONNEFILLE -=- JID: guyou@xxxxxxxxxxxx MSN: guilhem_bonnefille@xxxxxxxxxxx -=- mailto:guilhem.bonnefille@xxxxxxxxx -=- http://nathguil.free.fr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html