Johan Herland wrote: > As Thomas already stated, git log is porcelain, and its output format is not > set in stone. If you need a stable, script-friendly format, you should > probably use the --format option, or use plumbing instead (such as e.g. git > rev-list, which also has a --format option). But git log --format=raw --raw output was changed by notes. > > Might be worth documenting in release notes, maybe too late now though. > > But really, it's all good, notes are a great feature. > > > > PS, Has anyone thought about using notes to warn bisect away from > > commits that are known to be unbuildable or otherwise cause bisection > > trouble? > > No, I haven't thought of that specific use case. Great idea! :) Only problem I see with doing it is it might be too easy to overwrite such a note with git notes edit -m Did you consider having -m append a line to an existing note? -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature