Hi,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:13:20AM +0800, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Ilari Liusvaara
>> <ilari.liusvaara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hmm... In what conditions ref->status is 'none' after push operation
>> > has completed?
>>
>> when a match between a local and remote ref is not found.
>>
>> For example, the local ref 'master' will match the remote ref
>> 'master', but not 'retsam' ('master' spelled in reverse).
>
> How would it make any sense to set up a tracking branch, then? Not only
> is it not desired (if I said "git push -u foo:bar", I don't expect it to
> do _anything_ with some other local branch besides foo), but it wouldn't
> work, since the peer_ref pointer would be NULL.
Noted.
Ilari, please ignore my thought on 'none' then.
--
Cheers,
Ray Chuan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html