On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Samstag, 16. Januar 2010, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Samstag, 16. Januar 2010, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>> >> +static inline void mingw_fd_set(int fd, fd_set *set)
>> >> +{
>> >> + FD_SET(_get_osfhandle(fd), set);
>> >> +}
>> >> #undef FD_SET
>> >> +#define FD_SET(a,b) mingw_fd_set(a,b)
>> >> +
>> >> #undef FD_ISSET
>> >> #define FD_ISSET(fd, set) __WSAFDIsSet(_get_osfhandle(fd), (fd_set
>> >> *)(set))
>> >
>> > Ah, yes, how obvious ;) You are going to do the same with FD_ISSET as
>> > well, aren't you?
>>
>> Do I really need to? There's already a single function for that, with
>> no "ugly hidden internals" there; __WSAFDIsSet() is documented in
>> MSDN. I mean, Sure... I could... I just don't see the point.
>
> __WSAFDIsSet is "ugly hidden internals" and we should not rely on it when we
> can use the official FD_ISSET for our own FD_ISSET.
>
> -- Hannes
>
...but __WSAFDIsSet() seems to be every bit as official on Windows as
FD_ISSET() (documented in msdn, without any notes not to use it), so I
still don't really see the point.
However, I don't personally care one way or the other, so just doing
it is probably less work than convincing you that I don't have to ;)
--
Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html