--- Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dnia wtorek 10. pa�dziernika 2006 23:02, Luben Tuikov napisa�: > > > > Isn't that a simple "labelling" question? �I do not think > > > > anybody minds to show clickable string "contents" (instead of > > > > "blob" or "tree") at the places you mention above and if we did > > > > so everybody would be happy, right? > > > > > > Not, IMHO it is not a good idea. Clicking on file name leads to it > > > contents, but it is not obvoius what kind of view is it. "blob" link > > > > It is pretty obvious to me: the contents of the object, whether it be > > "blob" or "tree". �The contents of "blob" and the contents of "tree" > > as shown by gitweb. > > It's pretty obvous to you, because there is only one basic view of tree, > and one basic view of blob. It is not the case for example for commits > in shortlog view, where we have commit and commitdiff views. It is > possible that either blobs or trees acquire another views. Excuse me, weren't we talking about "blob" and "tree"? How come you all of a sudden introduce commits? Let's keep on topic: "blob" and "tree". Luben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html