On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 04:55:20PM +0100, Rudolf Polzer wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:43:10 +0100, Ilari Liusvaara
> <ilari.liusvaara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 04:12:49PM +0100, Rudolf Polzer wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
>
> Of course, but I assume the sign-off would not be by me, but by some
> of the git developers, and would depend on whether they actually
> want this feature.
It would need sign-off by you. Even if you took the code from somewhere
(and then it would need theirs as well) and passed it along.
> >- Should the tracking be set up even if only part of ref update suceeded
> >(for those that succeeded), not requiring all to succeed?
>
> Good point, but I simply see no clean way to set it up for the
> succeeded refs. Would be a nice idea for improvement of this.
Ah, that is only known in transport_push and what it calls (and transport_push
is last point to insert common functionality)...
> @@ -218,6 +249,8 @@ int cmd_push(int argc, const char **argv, const
> char *prefix)
> OPT_BOOLEAN( 0 , "thin", &thin, "use thin pack"),
> OPT_STRING( 0 , "receive-pack", &receivepack, "receive-pack",
> "receive pack program"),
> OPT_STRING( 0 , "exec", &receivepack, "receive-pack", "receive
> pack program"),
> + OPT_BIT('t', "track", &flags, "set up tracking mode (see git-pull(1))",
> + TRANSPORT_PUSH_TRACK),
> OPT_END()
> };
Linewrap damage.
-Ilari
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html