Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> I'd like to proceed with this series by (1) pulling from you and queuing
> the result in 'next', (2) asking other people (including Jonathan) to
> proofread and send necessary updates to the list, (3) asking you to check
> and queue these updates from others yourself and tell me to pull again to
> my 'next', and (4) merging the result to 'master' when done.
>
> Does it sound workable? Am I placing too much undue burden on you?
No, that's fine, and indeed I'm glad I'm not putting too much
conflict-resolution burden on you.
I took the not-yet-merged (I hope I understood the above right :-)
liberty of squashing fixes from Jonathan's review. I'll send the
interdiffs as a reply to this mail. They're now at
git://repo.or.cz/git/trast.git doc-style/for-next
(I'm leaving the old head in place for comparison). I'm gathering
incremental updates in
git://repo.or.cz/git/trast.git doc-style/pu
For now we have
Jonathan Nieder (2):
Documentation: git gc packs refs by default now
Documentation: tiny git config manual tweaks
Thomas Rast (1):
Documentation: show-files is now called git-ls-files
I'll also send the last one for review shortly, though it's rather
trivial.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html