Re: [PATCH 2/3] base85: No need to initialize the decode table in encode_85

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Andreas Gruenbacher venit, vidit, dixit 08.01.2010 14:39:
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> For the less informed it may be worthwhile to have an explanation in the
> commit message why encode_85() does not need to initialize the table. (I
> strongly suspect it's a matter of de vs. en, i.e. "because it only
> encodes but does not decode."...)

The title can be reworded to

    base85: encode85() does not use the decode table

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]