Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> writes: > Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes: > >> This is the count of actions invoked from the tree, commit and >> commitdiff view (using the referer information): >> >> blame blob total requests containing 'a=' >> #2 1 18 264 >> #1 31 23 399 >> #0 4 6 50 >> >> The disparation between #2 and #1,#0 is quite apparent. If we want more >> exact results, I will let #0 accumulate data for a week and then revert >> the removal of the links and start another sample. > > I am not sure -- you are certainly counting me looking at your > blame output while working on the slimmed down blame output (you > may remember that I noted that while your output gives names and > dates for each line which is busier I kind of liked it in one of > my previous messages), and we talked about gitweb blame lot > recently on the list so that might have spurred people's > curiosity. Having said that, I agree to the point you are trying to make here. It was a mistake to remove blob/tree links from the view that lists pathnames. If we did not have any obviously clickable links on the right hand side it might have been a different story, but when given UNIXy permission bits, pathname and blame/history/raw links, nobody would think of clicking on the pathname itself to grab its contents. The blame link would give you the same information (and a bit more) and people would just go there without much thinking. It probably is wise to resurrect those "redundant" links. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html