Re: [PATCH 0/4] Makefile fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio, could you tell us what happened to this thread?
>
> Makefile improvements.  No discussion.

I took 4/4, and after looking at them again, I think 2/4 looks sensible,
too.

I was puzzled by 3/4 and I still am; the dependency rules are the same for
%.o and %.s yet the patch changes only %.s.  Either it leaves the same
breakage for %.o (which is much more important in practice), or the
problem Jonathan has with %.s may have other causes, but it was unclear to
me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]