Am 04.01.2010 20:05, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@xxxxxx> writes: > >> Am 04.01.2010 18:51, schrieb Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy: >>> Incidentally I was just drafting git-super.sh it see how far it goes. >>> The goal was to implement some cross-module operations over time. "git >>> super status", "git super commit" and others could be handy. >> >> Hm, i'm not sure if this will really help us. I would rather see "git >> status" and friends do the right thing for submodules too. Maybe this >> has to be configurable but i think the separate commands that one has >> to use for submodules now are part of the usability problems we are >> seeing. > Both will be valid approaches to work toward the same goal. A separate > prototype implementation can be a way to easily figure out what the > desired features are. > For the past 12 months, you and Johan Herland were the people who had more > than one patches with substance to git-submodule.sh and I would really > appreciate and at the same time want to encourage experimentation by > people like you who are heavy users with need for a better submodule > support. Right. It was not my intention to discourage such experimentations with my reply. I'm sorry if my email made this impression. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html