Hi, On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Sebastian Schuberth wrote: > Anyway, IMHO the correct declaration of e.g. getuid() is not "int > getuid()", but "uid_t getuid()" etc. So even if the uid_t type was not > required, it's a good change I think. FWIW I concur with this reasoning. Even if in this particular case, we could work around the issue, it is basically a non-intrusive, minimal janitorial patch. Especially since the original author of the wrong signature concurs. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html