Junio C Hamano wrote: > Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes: > >> Is there a problem with taking <200610061231.06017.jnareb@xxxxxxxxx>? >> >> I think it's currently not worth the complexity and breakage of >> backwards compatibility to do the more elaborate form you proposed. > > I agree with that, except that the 72x27 dimension bit troubles > me. First, that's the problem for the future. The 72x27 was there, I have not introduced this. Second, 72x27 is size override, so although logo would better be 72x27, but if it is not it will be scaled to given size. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/objects.html#visual -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html