Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Come to think of it, it might make sense to change the >> meaning of "true" to do what this patch does. I do not think >> of reasons to create missing reflog for tags automatically >> anyway. > > If we change meaning of "true", perhaps (just in case in case) we > should add "all" value? Didn't I just say that I do not think of reasons to do so ;-)? Saying "just in case" is not enough. You need to say at least "this hypothetical workflow which requires to update refs/xxx and doing automated reflog creation only under refs/heads makes that workflow less convenient". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html