Hi, On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Martin Storsj? <martin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Should I send in a new patch that removes the http.authAny option and >> always enables this, or send a rewritten version of the patch that already >> is in 'next'? > > I'm not Junio, but I would suggest sending in a new patch series, > and asking Junio politely to revert the one that is currently in > next before merging in the new series. > > If we really are killing http.authAny before it hits master, there > is no reason for it to appear in the final project history. hmm, a few days back Junio (added to Cc list) sent out an email regarding branch shuffling and dropping topics from 'next'. Junio, could we piggyback on this? -- Cheers, Ray Chuan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html