Re: [RFC PATCH] Add WEBDAV timeout to http-fetch.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 21:52:02 -0700
Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Using DAV, if it works with the server, has the advantage of not
> having to keep objects/info/packs up-to-date from repository
> owner's point of view.  But the repository owner ends up keeping
> up-to-date as a side effect of keeping info/refs up-to-date
> anyway (as I do not see a code to read that information over
> DAV), so there is no point doing this over DAV in practice.
> 
> Perhaps we should remove call to remote_ls() from
> fetch_indices() unconditionally, not just protected with
> NO_EXPAT and be done with it?

That makes a lot of sense.  A server really has to always provide
a objects/info/packs anyway, just to be fetchable today by clients
that are compiled with NO_EXPAT.

+1

Sean

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]