On 2009-12-21 14:48, Karl Wiberg wrote:
I've seen more than one complaint that the current behavior is confusing even if we don't count the bug, so I thought this was part of the motivation.
I don't know if this would be better than the other suggested solutions, but if "stg log" would clearly identify multi-stage entries as such, the current confusion would probably mostly go away.
Currently this is done reasonably well for make_temp_patch(), which says "refresh (create temporary patch)" in the log, but I think this could be taken further.
For example, if such annotations said "foo: stage N" or similar, indicating that this was the Nth step in the "foo" command (think "rebase" or whatever), it would be good enough for me least.
- Gustav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html