Dear diary, on Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 10:38:51PM CEST, I got a letter where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> said that... > Petr Baudis wrote: > > > So, I'd like to either have the view links or the filenames in classical > > link style so that it's apparent they are clickable; I didn't post a > > patch since I didn't have time/energy to fight for it yet. ;-) > > There is a tradeout. Either have easily distinguishable directories and > files, by using both different color and decoration (underline), or we have > filename/directory name clearly marked as link. One or the other. > > That is why I'd rather have this "redundant" blob/tree link (perhaps in > separate column). As I suggested in another mail, perhaps the whole problem is wrong and you shouldn't have to dug for trees in a bunch of blobs in the first place - let's group all the trees at the top, as all the well-behaved directory listings do. > But this is a matter of policy, unless we want to add theme support to > gitweb ;-)) We _do_ have that - you can supply your own gitweb.css. But the defaults should be sensible. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html