Re: [PATCH] Let format-patch and rebase ignore trivial merges.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [091218 14:22]:
> > format-patch has to choose a parent. Choosing the first one make the
> > most sense for me (as the first is the only real 'special' one).
> > In the workflows I envision the first parent would also be the one with
> > the clean history.
>
> Then use
>
>    git format-patch --first-parent upstream..

As already described in the thread my mail contained a link to, this
will miss patches if there were also real merges (which there will).

But the point that there is only a --first-parent and no --last-parent
shows that the first parent is special, so format-patch should choose
the first one.

Hochachtungsvoll,
	Bernhard R. Link
-- 
Please do not CC me if also sending to git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]