Re: [PATCH/RFC] ignore unknown color configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:25:36PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> >> I would be more sympathetic to that user if this weren't the _only_ set
> >> of variables with this property. They don't get warned for diff.externel
> >> or color.show-branch.
> >
> > True and fair enough.  Let's have this in 1.6.6 then.
> 
> Actually I think we should have this in 1.6.5.X as well for it to be
> useful.  Am I mistaken?

The earlier the better for making it useful, but it is still somewhat of
a lost cause for color.diff.func. The problem comes from using git
v1.6.6, setting the variable, and then going to back to some older
version (either because you are testing multiple versions, or because
your config is shared across multiple machines).

So yes, putting it in v1.6.5.x means switching back there will not be as
painful. But switching back to existing versions will still be broken
until all older versions you might want to switch to have this patch.

So we are not so much fixing this color.diff.func problem as
future-proofing against this happening again.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]