Re: git-reflog 70 minutes at 100% cpu and counting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 16:23 -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 04:20:29PM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > > Updated to git-1.6.5.3-1 from Fedora rawhide and still git reflog ran
> >> > > for >5 minutes at 100% cpu (I killed it, it didn't finish)
> >> > > 
> >> > > I'm pushing a copy of the whole repo (all 1.9G after bzip compression)
> >> > > to
> >> > > 
> >> > > http://people.redhat.com/~eparis/git-tar/
> >> > 
> >> > Wowzers, that's big. Can you send just what's in .git?
> >> 
> >> So I zipped up just .git   1.2G.  I did a make clean and zipped up the
> >> whole repo  1.3G.
> >> 
> >> Just started pushing the 1.3G file.
> >> 
> >> Maybe having a .git directory that large is the problem?
> >
> > Shouldn't be, unless your repo is really badly packed.
> >
> > What's the output of 'git count-objects -v' ?
> 
> Didn't somebody say that the trace hints an infinite loop not "slow
> because of bad packing"?

Maybe.  But I was curious about the size too, which turns out to be 
really bad packing.  Of course bad packing shouldn't affect the 
correctness of the repository.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]