Re: [PATCH 2/3] commit/status: "git add <path>" is not necessarily how to resolve

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 01:02:02AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> When the desired resolution is to remove the path, "git rm <path>" is the
> command the user needs to use.  Just like in "Changed but not updated"
> section, suggest to use "git add/rm" as appropriate.

I no longer even see these messages due to advice.statushints, but the
overall direction of the series looks sane to me.

However:

> -	color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, c, "#   (use \"git add <file>...\" to mark resolution)");
> +	color_fprintf_ln(s->fp, c, "#   (use \"git add/rm <file>...\" as appropriately to mark resolution)");

This should be "as appropriate".

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]