Re: [PATCH] mergetool--lib: add diffmerge as a pre-configured mergetool option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Perhaps it is a better approach to first eject bulk of code for the
> backends we currently support under these case statements into separate
> files, one per backend, move them to mergetool/ subdirectory in the source
> tree, install them as "$(share)/git-core/mergetool/$toolname", and at
> runtime source them?  That way, a patch to add a new backend can be as
> simple as adding a new file in mergetool/ and doing nothing else.  Also an
> end user can privately add support to a new backend much more easily.
>
> Anybody want to try that approach?

Sure. There may also be value in emulating the mercurial approach:

  http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/MergeToolConfiguration

I'll give both a shot.

j.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]