Re: [PATCH 2/2] status -s: obey color.status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 07.12.2009 06:17:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:04:38PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> 
>> Make the short version of status obey the color.status boolean. We color
>> the status letters only, because they carry the state information and are
>> potentially colored differently, such as for a file with staged changes
>> as well as changes in the worktree against the index.
> 
> This seems to also turn on color for --porcelain in some cases, because
> git_status_config unconditionally sets s->use_color if you are using
> color.status instead of color.ui. I think we are probably best just
> explicitly disabling options for the "porcelain" format rather than
> trying to come up with some trickery to make sure they never get set.
> Like:

Thanks. I let myself get fooled by the apparent option handling within
the switch statement (which is OK for relativePaths) (and some
subconscious link between null_termination and porcelain, which goes one
way only).

I guess this shows (again) that one needs tests for everything... If I
get around to I'll amend t$(relevantoneicantrecallrightnow) with tests
for long and short status with color and porcelain with the various options.

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]