Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] MSVC: Fix an "incompatible pointer types" compiler warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Removed Junio from Cc because IIUC, he prefers to be left out of the loop in 
Windows related matters until they have settled.]

On Samstag, 5. Dezember 2009, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> The patch is still marked RFC because:
>     - I'm still not sure if the flexibility to support both 32- and 64-bit
>       time_t is required.
>     - should -D_USE_32BIT_TIME_T be added to the Makefile?

If *not* using -D_USE_32BIT_TIME_T  produces a build or code base that is in 
some way superior, why should we require it? For example, its absence could 
help a 64bit build.

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]