Hi,
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >>> If the idea of a "fix" command is acceptable, then I would like to
> >>> implement a further convenience: if a group of commits to be folded
> >>> together includes *only* "fix" commits, then the first log message
> >>> should be used without even opening an editor. But I would like to
> >>> get a reaction to the "fix" command in general before doing so.
> >>
> >> I'd say that would make a useful command ("fix") even more useful, being
> >> just the right counterpart to "reword" for trivial commit message fixes.
> >
> > +1 for fix, and +1 for the "don't even launch the editor" too.
>
> I like it, too. Also I vaguely recall that there was a series that died
> that would have allowed you to give hints to help this behaviour at the
> time you make "fix-up" commits; we may want to resurrect it on top of this
> feature.
I'll just repeat this exactly one more time: it is not always possible to
know whether you make a fix-up commit, and it is not always possible to be
sure that you want to amend the next time you do a rebase.
So: Commit time is definitely a bad time to decide on the action in some
future rebase event.
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html