Hi, On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Michael Haggerty venit, vidit, dixit 04.12.2009 15:36: > > Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh | 9 +++++---- > > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh > > index 3a37793..073674f 100755 > > --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh > > +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh > > @@ -16,13 +16,14 @@ set_fake_editor > > > > # set up two branches like this: > > # > > -# A - B - C - D - E > > +# A - B - C - D - E (master) > > # \ > > -# F - G - H > > +# F - G - H (branch1) > > # \ > > -# I > > +# I (branch2) > > # > > -# where B, D and G touch the same file. > > +# where B, D and G touch the same file. In addition, set tags at > > +# points A, F, and I. > > > > test_expect_success 'setup' ' > > : > file1 && > > My first reaction to the subject was "Huh? What repository?". So I > suggest something like > > t3404: Better document the original repository layout > > as a more descriptive subject. That would be good, the patch itself is already good. ACK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html