* Karl Wiberg <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx> wrote: > > The upshot is that in stg mail, --git and --mbox don't interact > > well, and the resulting mbox file will lack the recipients. This > > might be fixed in the future if we teach git send-email how to > > generate mbox files, but then we introduce a versioning problem. > > One wild idea: git send-email's --smtp-server flag will accept the > (full) path of a sendmail program; writing such a program, just > capable enough to receive the outgoing emails and dumping them to a > file, should be easy. Another option would be a program that speaks > just enough SMTP to accept the mails. (Incidentally, these two would > be useful in testing stg mail even without the --git option.) Hm, I think this is getting to be a bit of overkill. I could see adding --mbox support to git send-email as being a better use of time (IMO). > I fully understand if you'd rather get on with scratching your actual > itch, though ... :) > > So let's just accept this wart for now, and say, if you want an mbox > > file generated, don't use --git. That seems reasonable to me. > > Sure. Thanks, /ac -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html