Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 08:52:45AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > > Or better, why this is even necessary? > > I have seen requests for gits:// (and in fact, I have plans to > implement that protocol). > > For instance, to support new types of authentication for smart transports > without patching client git binaries (SSH has lots of failure modes that > are quite nasty to debug) or abusing GIT_PROXY (yuck). So the bulk of this series is about making a proxy for git:// easier to tie into git? Forgive me if I sound stupid, but for gits:// shouldn't that just be a matter of git_connect() forking a git-remote-gits process linked against openssl? Or, maybe it just runs `openssl s_client`? Why go through all of this effort of making a really generic proxy protocol system when the long-term plan is to just ship native gits:// support as part of git-core? -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html