On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> I've queued the series with minor fixes to 'pu' and pushed it out. >> >> Since I see you didn't change a couple of things you mentioned in >> earlier comments (the NEEDSWORK comment and the sq-then-eval trick) do >> you still want me to respin this series? > > The commit still is NEEDSWORK and shouldn't be in 'next' in its current > shape. I don't think the topic is 1.6.6 material yet, and we will be in > pre-release feature freeze any minute now, so there is no urgency. > > As I did the sq-then-eval in many places in our Porcelain scripts (and > many of them are converted to C and lost the need for the trick), I may > get tempted to fix it up when I am bored ;-). But no promises. I'll interpret that as "no, I should not respin the series because Junio plans to deal with it" :) Do let me know if there's anything I should do to help this advance from pu->next sooner (if they delay is not simply because of the code freeze). Have fun, Avery -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html