On Montag, 30. November 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> To avoid that, I think (1) the marker has to be more reliable than just
> "happens to have the same tree", and (2) the traversal done by Porcelains
> (your patches 3 thru 5) by default should be unaware of eqt.
>
> I don't know what a suitable marker should look like, though. The marker
> must be easily identifiable by the lowest level rev-list machinery, so it
> needs to be a sign left somewhere in the commit object.
Wouldn't the pathspec . be the marker:
git rev-list HEAD -- .
follows only one of the branches that have identical trees.
-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html