Test 16/17 had been fixed since its introduction in b4d1690 (Teach Git to respect skip-worktree bit (reading part), 2009-08-20). So, mark it as expect_success rather than expect_failure. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I'm actually wondering about 17/17 as well. If commit is called with a file name then shouldn't it simply commit the current state of the file in the worktree, no matter what the index or skip-worktree say? I therefore think 17/17 should be expect_success and have no test_must_fail. t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh b/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh index e996928..8960dd9 100755 --- a/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh +++ b/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git-rm succeeds on skip-worktree absent entries' ' git rm 1 ' -test_expect_failure 'commit on skip-worktree absent entries' ' +test_expect_success 'commit on skip-worktree absent entries' ' git reset && setup_absent && test_must_fail git commit -m null 1 -- 1.6.6.rc0.274.g71380 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html