Re: [PATCH 1/2] format-patch: fix dashdash usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  (0) take your patch with an updated message (eh, that is not "next step"
>     but the "first step");

I guess it depends of what is the "fist step". To me the "first step"
is realizing there's a problem. First patch submission is already many
steps afterwards.

But sure, I'll do this next step :)

>  (1) make --full-diff implicit and default of format-patch (--no-full-diff
>     could be supported _if_ somebody can argue successfully why limiting
>     the diff is also a useful thing to do); and

I started writing this patch but it turns out there's no --no-full-diff.

>  (2) document clearly that format-patch takes optional pathspecs, and in
>     what situation they are useful.

I guess this would have to be done in multiple places so it might take
me some time.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]