Hi, On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Johannes Sixt wrote: > From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> > > The list of header files was incomplete because a number of header files > were added to the code base, but were not added to the list LIB_H that we > have in the Makefile. This meant that no rebuild was triggered if one of > the missing headers was changed because we do not have automatic > dependency tracking, either. > > Sidestep the issue by computing the list using $(wildcard). Funny; I thought that not all header files are library header files, i.e. not all header changes should trigger a full new build of libgit.a. Am I wrong? Ciao, Dscho P.S.: Something that comes to mind is the http.h header, which should really be independent of libgit.a. Which reminds me: do we _still_ tell libgit.a at _compile time_ whether git-remote-http is compiled with cURL? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html