Re: Merge priority

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 13:44, Howard Miller <howard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I now want to update all my customer branches with the latest fixes
> and patches. Naively, I would just check out each branch and merge the
> stable branch - job done. However, is it sensible to ask if there is a
> way to say that the stable branch is more important if there are
> conflicts.

No, all branches are equal. Besides, are you sure it is safe to just take
your stable version of the code in a conflict? Maybe the stable code uses
something a customer branch renamed or removed?

You can take a look at rerere, though. It should help resolving repeating
conflicts  by recording a resolution of your choice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]