Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: ... >> I.e. the first and second + were swallowed, but not the third one. ... > Without looking at asciidoc 8.0 source, my guess is that it > treats _anything_ that has two pluses on the same input line as > quoted by some magical '+'-pair quote. Can you try > reformatting the original > >> <refspec>:: >> The canonical format of a <refspec> parameter is >> `+?<src>:<dst>`; that is, an optional plus `+`, followed >> by the source ref, followed by a colon `:`, followed by >> the destination ref. > > to something like > >> <refspec>:: >> The canonical format of a <refspec> parameter is >> `+?<src>:<dst>`; that is, an optional plus >> `+`, followed >> by the source ref, followed by a colon `:`, followed by >> the destination ref. > > and verify that conjecture? This hack does not help. The two `+` are still absent from the manpage (but as before, the `+` in the next paragraph is printed as desired). -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-==- =-=- --=-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html