On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx> wrote: > * Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > If you are changing StGit to call git-send-email anyway, why not > > arrange stgit to call git-send-email to send the message out > > instead, instead of sending messages on its own? > > Yeah, I thought about that as I was poking around further in StGit > to figure out how it would be calling git-send-email. ;) > > > I imagine the internal implementation of stg mail would work > > something like: > > > > prepare messages to send out > > call git-send-email and have it send them > > > > What am I missing? > > My lack of familiarity with StGit internals. ;) > > Your suggestion is much better. I'll take a closer look at StGit and > see how feasible it is. > > Unless Catalin has strong objections? I think that sounds like a splendid idea. It would be interesting to see just how thin a wrapper around git send-email (and format-patch) stg mail could become, without sacrificing features anyone actually uses. The main complication could be stg mail's templates. Catalin, how wedded are you to those? ;-) -- Karl Wiberg, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx subrabbit.wordpress.com www.treskal.com/kalle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html