Luben Tuikov wrote: > --- Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I like the fact that the "data part" of blame is text, and >> > that the commit-8 is on the left, and color-chunked. Sometimes >> > people simply _remember_ a number of commit-8's and thus the >> > layout of blame is intentional, since they can look to the left >> > and recognize a commit-8... >> >> It is not only the initial commit. A substantial rewrite and >> new development also has the same issue. >> >> I think you are also contradicting yourself by saying that >> people would recognize a commit-8, and at the same time you do >> not like the chunk code that makes sure you do not get too few >> of them. If people _do_ recognize commit-8 (I seriously doubt >> that), then wouldn't it help to make sure you have them on every >> couple-dozen lines so that the user would see the familiar one >> even when scrolled? > > It is not that I don't like it. For example if we didn't have > the block-per-commit-coloring, then we'd make use of this, but it > seems that the block-per-commit-coloring exists for the purpose to > show conglomerations of same-commit lines, thus obviating the need > to repeat it (commit-8) every so many lines. Colors repeat. They are not enough. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html