On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Intland Software wrote:
More precisely: parts of the source code are actually open, including
the wiki plugins and the remote clients, for instance. The core source
is closed, because the same core is also used in our commercial offerings,
and
our commercial license doesn't (currently) allow publishing the
complete code. We have quite some large customers from the defense space
that would not be happy if we opened everything ;)
are you sure? did you see the recent memo about OpenSource by the DOD?
David Lang
We are currently in the midst of rethinking our licensing scheme
in general, to make things more liberal or to set up some kind of a
dual license.
I think a lot of people wonder now, how does this compare to existing
solutions; from your announcement I thought it's something like
Gitosis/Gitolite, but in fact it seems more similar to Gitorious or
GitHub (if it was publicly available, of course); perhaps it would be
good idea to present comparison to these on the project homepage.
Good point. More on this later.
---
Intland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html